On AIX systems, users may notice a significant difference between the memory utilization reported by the OS (using commands like `svmon`) in the DB2 agent and the memory utilization reported by the Host Agent in Foglight or similar monitoring tools. For example, a direct OS query may show close to 100% memory usage, while the Host Agent reports a much lower utilization (e.g., 52%). This can cause confusion when interpreting system health and resource usage.
The discrepancy arises from different definitions and calculations of "used" and "available" memory:
DB2 Agent OS-level metrics (svmon, usedrampct):
These metrics include all memory in use, including buffers and filesystem cache. On AIX and Linux, the operating system aggressively uses available RAM for caching, resulting in very little "free" RAM and a "used" percentage close to 100%.
Host Agent metrics
The Host Agent typically reports memory utilization as `(Total - Available) / Total * 100`, where "Available" memory includes truly free memory and may also include cache and buffers that can be quickly reclaimed for applications. This results in a lower percentage (e.g., 52%), which reflects the actual memory pressure from applications rather than total OS resource usage.
Timing of collection:
The Host Agent may collect data at a different time interval (e.g., within the past 300 seconds), which can also cause slight variations in reported values.
This behavior is expected and not a product defect. The key is to understand what each metric represents:
For DB2 agent OS-level monitoring (usedrampct, svmon, etc.):
For Host Agent/application-level monitoring:
Best Practices: